Legal Opinion

In Re: Carrington H. - Concurring In Part and Dissenting In Part

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided January 29, 2016No. M2014-00453-SC-R11-PTPublished

1Opinion of the Court

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE May 28, 2015 Session IN RE CARRINGTON H. ET AL. Appeal by Permission from the Court of Appeals, Middle Section Appeal from the Juvenile Court for Maury County Nos. 90576, 90577 George L. Lovell, Judge _____________________________ No. M2014-00453-SC-R11-PT – Filed January 29, 2016 ____________________________ SHARON G. LEE, C.J., with whom GARY R. WADE, J., joins, concurring in part and dissenting in part. The Court has decided that an indigent parent has the right to assistance of counsel—but not the right to effective assistance of counsel—in a…

2Cases cited41 opinions

  1. Santosky v. KramerSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. Pennsylvania v. FinleySupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  3. Lassiter v. Department of Social Servs. of Durham Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
  4. Ross v. MoffittSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  5. In the Interest of M.S.Texas Supreme Court · 2003

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API