Legal Opinion

Michigan-Lafayette Building Co. v. Continental Bank

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 2, 1930No. Docket No. 61, Calendar No. 34,761PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNobth, J.

Plaintiff, as lessor, in May, 1924, entered into a written lease with the defendant for a five-year term beginning July 1, 1924, covering “Store No. 3” of the Lafayette building of Detroit. Defendant occupied the premises as a branch banking house substantially-13 months. The rent was paid to August 1, 1925, and thereupon the defendant abandoned the premises and sought to terminate the lease. Plaintiff endeavored to relet the premises and succeeded in doing so November 16, 1926. In this suit plaintiff recovered rentals accruing from August 1, 1925, to November 16, 1926, which, with accrued…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Murphy v. BonewellMichigan Supreme Court · 1922

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Michigan Lafayette Building Co. v. Continental BankMichigan Supreme Court · 1933
  2. Fox v. RoethlisbergerMichigan Supreme Court · 1957

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API