Public Service Co. v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BUSH, Judge.
This ease is before the court on defendant’s motion for summary judgment under Rule 56 of the Rules of the United States Court of Federal Claims (RCFC). The scope of the parties’ briefing is restricted to a question of whether the United States waived one of its contract rights. For the reasons set forth below, the court grants defendant’s motion.
BACKGROUND1
Plaintiff Public Sendee Company of Oklahoma (PSO) is an electric utility company operating in certain parts of Oklahoma. Compl. at 1. The McAlester Army Ammunition Plant (MCAAP) of the United States Army is located in…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Sweats Fashions, Inc. v. Pannill Knitting Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1987
- Barmag Barmer Maschinenfabrik Ag v. Murata MacHinery Ltd., and Murata of America, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
- Seaboard Lumber Company and Capital Development Company v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2002
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Lake Charles Xxv, LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2014
- Little v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2015
- Vandesande v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2017