Legal Opinion
McCormick v. Principi
United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims
Decided October 17, 2002No. 98-48PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
STEINBERG, Judge, filed the opinion of the Court. IVERS, Judge, filed a dissenting opinion.
STEINBERG, Judge:
The appellant, veteran Mack A. McCormick, previously appealed through counsel a December 16,1997, decision of the Board of Veterans’ Appeals (Board or BVA) that had denied as not well grounded his claim for Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) service connection for loss of vision. See McCormick v. Gober, 14 Vet.App. 39, 41 (2000). On August 18, 2000, the Court vacated that Board decision and remanded the matter for readjudication. Id. at 50. Currently pending before the Court is the…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Blum v. StensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Buckhannon Board & Care Home, Inc. v. West Virginia Dept. of Health and Human ResourcesSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Sims v. ApfelSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Ramos v. LammCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1983
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Leamon Johnson , Jr. v. Anthony J. PrincipiUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 2004
- Scarborough v. NicholsonUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 2005
- Zuri Zuberi v. R. James NicholsonUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 2006
- Mamie L. Gordon v. Anthony J. PrincipiUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 2003
- Alfred W. Vahey v. R. James NicholsonUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 2006
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.