Legal Opinion

Hotel St. George Associates v. Morgenstern

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided April 20, 1993No. 92 CIV 6960 (CBM)PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION ON PRE-TRIAL MOTIONS

MOTLEY, District Judge.

Defendants move for judgment on the pleadings pursuant to Rule 12(c) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Plaintiff moves for the voluntary dismissal of the entire action pursuant to Rule 41(a)(2). Defendants’ move for sanctions pursuant to Rule 11 or the inherent power of the court. Defendants’ motion for judgment on the pleadings, which this court treated as a motion for summary judgment, is granted. Plaintiffs motion for voluntary dismissal is denied. Defendants’ motion for sanctions is denied.

I. BACKGROUND

This case arises out of a…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. New York Times Co. v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  4. Chambers v. Nasco, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
  5. Alyeska Pipeline Service Co. v. Wilderness SocietySupreme Court of the United States · 1975

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Puglisi v. Underhill Park Taxpayer Assoc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1996
  2. In re Risk Management Alternatives, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2002
  3. Alfred Weissman Real Estate, Inc. v. Big V Supermarkets, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
  4. Pisello v. Town of BrookhavenDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1996
  5. Yeshiva Chofetz Chaim Radin, Inc. v. Village of New HempsteadDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2000

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API