Legal Opinion

Bowler v. McIntyre

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided October 17, 1893PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*307Opinion op the Court, by

Frear, J.

Error to the Circuit Court of the First Circuit.

John S. Walker, now deceased, recovered judgment against the plaintiff in error and eight others, in assumpsit upon a note. The words of the note are, “We jointly promise,” etc. The judgment is “that the plaintiff do recover against the defendants,” etc. It is assigned as error, “that said judgment was erroneously made and entered as a joint and several judgment [against] the defendants and not as a joint judgment only.” The defendant in error pleaded in mdlo est erratum.

Counsel for defendant in error contends…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Credit Co. v. Arkansas Central Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1888
  2. Dutcher v. WrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  3. Simpson v. GreeleySupreme Court of the United States · 1874
  4. Smith v. GaleSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
  5. Miller v. McKenzieSupreme Court of the United States · 1871

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. In Re ChongUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Hawaii · 1980
  2. Harrison v. MagoonHawaii Supreme Court · 1901
  3. Cummings v. IaukeaHawaii Supreme Court · 1895
  4. Castle v. Kapiolani Estate, Ltd.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1904
  5. Robinson v. KaaeHawaii Supreme Court · 1915

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API