Legal Opinion

United States v. Marsha Arlene Massengill

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Decided March 19, 2009No. 08-15207UnpublishedCited by 1 opinion

Non-Argument Calendar.

1Per curiam

Philip A. Barr (“Barr”), appointed counsel for Marsha Arlene Massengill (“Mas-sengill”), has moved to withdraw from further representation of Massengill and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), in support of his motion. Massen-gill’s appeal concerns the district court’s revocation of her supervised release and the court’s sentence of twenty-one months of imprisonment. Although Barr has complied with the Anders requirements, our independent review of the record has revealed that the district court failed to comply with 18 U.S.C. §…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Anders v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Penson v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  3. United States v. Velasquez VelasquezCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2008
  4. United States v. MasseyCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1996
  5. United States v. Kenneth Patrick DelvecchioCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1991

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. United States v. Ronnie MontsdeocaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API