Collins v. County of Alameda
District Court, N.D. California
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 CLAYTON COLLINS, 7 Case No. 24-cv-03283-JCS Plaintiff, 8 v. ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY 9 CASE SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED COUNTY OF ALAMEDA, et al., UNDER
28 U.S.C. § 1915
10 Defendants. 11 12 13 I. INTRODUCTION 14 Plaintiff Clayton Collins, pro se, applied to proceed in forma pauperis and the Court 15 granted his application. See Docket no. 4. The Court now reviews the sufficiency of Plaintiff’s 16 complaint to determine whether it satisfies 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B). Because the complaint 17 does not appear to state any viable…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Will v. Michigan Department of State PoliceSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Lopez v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- Imbler v. PachtmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Stump v. SparkmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.