Legal Opinion

Lantigua v. Lopes

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided July 9, 1997No. Nos. 96-2392, 96-3536PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

We affirm the final judgment under review. With regard to the appellees’ motion for appellate attorney’s fees, pursuant to sections 768.79(1) and 59.46, Florida Statutes (1995), the fees sought are granted.

In the case of Metropolitan Dade County v. Cerezo, 21 Fla. L. Weekly D984, — So.2d -[1996 WL 195022] (Fla. 3d DCA April 24, 1996), we considered this issue and wrote an opinion. That opinion never became final because the appeal was subsequently dismissed.1 Nonetheless, the observations made therein are totally applicable and appropriate to the facts of this case and are reproduced below,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Schmidt v. FortnerDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1993
  2. Williams v. BrochuDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1991
  3. Mark Arnold Constr. v. Nat'l LumberDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1994
  4. Westfield Ins. Co. v. MendoleraDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1994
  5. Metropolitan Dade County v. CerezoDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1996

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Motter Roofing, Inc. v. LeibowitzDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API