Legal Opinion

Emo v. Milbank Mutual Insurance Company

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided January 29, 1971No. Civ. 8652PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PAULSON, Judge.

This is an appeal from the judgment of the District Court of Stutsman County, North Dakota, in favor of Jerome Emo and against Milbank Mutual Insurance Company [hereinafter called Milbank], a foreign insurance corporation authorized to do business in North Dakota. . This is a libel action tried by the district court, sitting without a jury, and Milbank has appealed from the entire judgment, demanding a trial de novo. The facts 'are not in dispute. Eunice Southwick, an employee of an insurance company, secured an automobile insurance policy with Mil-*511bank, through her employer,…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Farmers Educational & Cooperative Union v. WDAY, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1959
  2. Vojak v. JensenSupreme Court of Iowa · 1968
  3. Rickbeil v. Grafton Deaconess HospitalNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1946
  4. Bonkowski v. Arlan's Department StoreMichigan Supreme Court · 1970
  5. Bartels v. Retail Credit CompanyNebraska Supreme Court · 1970

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. International Administrators, Inc. And Sheldon Harrison v. Life Insurance Company of North AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1985
  2. Soentgen v. Quain & Ramstad Clinic, P.C.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Runnels v. OkamotoHawaii Supreme Court · 1974
  4. Forster v. West Dakota Veterinary Clinic, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2004
  5. Jose v. Norwest Bank North Dakota, N.A.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1999

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API