Legal Opinion

Whitley v. Tessman

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided April 11, 1949No. Docket No. 57, Calendar No. 44,258PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBtjtzel, J.

Bernard Whitley, plaintiff and appellee, filed a bill in chancery for the specific performance of a land contract and to enjoin an action in ejectment brought by the defendants herein to quiet their title to the land. On August 6, 1936, Henry H. Masten, a single man, and William F. Mahar and Carol L. Mahar, his wife, as vendors, entered into a contract to sell to V. H. Thornburgh 5 lots in the township of Garfield, Mackinac county, Michigan, containing about 171.60 acres. The consideration named was $5,000, of which $500 was paid a.t the time the contract was executed and the balance,…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Dressel v. AmeribankMichigan Supreme Court · 2003
  2. Poelman v. PayneMichigan Supreme Court · 1952
  3. Marrs v. TaylorMichigan Supreme Court · 1950
  4. Adora Wilmore-Moody v. Mohammed ZakirMichigan Supreme Court · 2023
  5. Adora Wilmore-Moody v. Mohammed ZakirMichigan Supreme Court · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API