Cisco v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
DICE, Judge.
The conviction is for driving while intoxicated; the punishment, three days in jail and a fine of $100.
Appellant predicates his appeal upon one ground of error — which is the contention that the complaint, upon which the information was based, “as to substance, is unconstitutional, void and a nullity since there is no allegation therein of affiant’s personal knowledge or showing of probable cause that the offense was committed by Defendant.”
Giordenello v. United States, 357 U.S. 480, 78 S.Ct. 1245, 2 L.Ed.2d 1503, and Barnes v. State of Texas, Tex.Cr.App., 390 S.W.2d 266,…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Giordenello v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Vallejo v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1966
- Barnes v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Barnes v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1965
3Cited by22 opinions
- Gordon v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1990
- Wells v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1974
- Coyle v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1989
- Knox v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1979
- Chapa v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1967
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.