Legal Opinion
Dolben v. Duncan Construction Co.
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Decided June 26, 1931PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSanderson, J.
The plaintiff brought this bill against the Duncan Construction Company, the city of Medford, and the New Amsterdam Casualty Company, hereinafter referred to, respectively, as the contractor, the city, and the surety, alleging that the contractor entered into a contract with the city for the construction of a school building and defaulted in performance of the contract. The plain*247tiff is a subcontractor and the bill is brought both in his own behalf and in behalf of all subcontractors who may join therein to obtain satisfaction for their claims from the money retained by the city under the…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Equitable Surety Co. v. United States Ex Rel. McMillanSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
- Friedman v. County of HampdenMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1910
- Brockton Olympia Realty Co. v. LeeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1929
- Smedley v. WaldenMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1923
- Moore v. SpiegelMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1887
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- United States Steel v. M. DeMatteo Construction Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2002
- Warren Brothers Company, Etc. v. Cardi CorporationCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1973
- Peerless Unit Ventilation Co. v. D'Amore Construction Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1933
- Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. CasassaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1938
- Barry v. DuffinMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1935
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.