Legal Opinion
Pit River Tribe v. Bureau of Land Management
District Court, E.D. California
Decided June 1, 2022No. 2:19-cv-02483Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 10 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 12 PIT RIVER TRIBE; NATIVE No. 2:19-cv-2483 KJM AC COALITION FOR MEDICINE LAKE 13 HIGHLANDS DEFENSE; MOUNT SHASTA BIOREGIONAL ECOLOGY 14 CENTER; and QUALITY ORDER ENVIRONMENT, 15 Plaintiffs, 16 v. 17 BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT; 18 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR; CALPINE 19 CORPORATION; and CPN TELEPHONE FLAT, INC., 20 Defendants. 21 22 This case arises under the Administrative Procedures Act (“APA”) and challenges leases 23 issued by the Bureau of Land Management (“BLM”). The case is before…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Florida Power & Light Co. v. LorionSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Asarco, Inc. v. U. S. Environmental Protection AgencyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
- Friends of the Clearwater v. DombeckCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- 97 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 516, 97 Daily Journal D.A.R. 829 Independence Mining Company, Inc. v. Bruce Babbitt, Secretary of the Interior United States Department of the Interior and the Bureau of Land ManagementCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
- Western Watersheds Project v. PoolDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.