Legal Opinion

Hennum v. City of Medina

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided March 2, 1987No. Civ. 11352PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ERICKSTAD, Chief Justice.

Stanley Hennum appeals from the judgment of the district court limiting his recovery of damages for breach of an employment contract against the City of Medina, and limiting his recovery of damages for tortious interference with contract against the mayor of Medina, Ernest Moser. Hen-num also appeals the district court’s dismissal of his claim for relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against Mayor Moser for terminating his employment without due process.

Mayor Moser and the City of Medina cross-appeal from the judgment of the district court finding that Mayor Moser terminated…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
  3. Cleveland Board of Education v. LoudermillSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. Perry v. SindermannSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  5. Boddie v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1971

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Peterson v. ZerrNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Livingood v. MeeceNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Trade 'N Post, L.L.C. v. World Duty Free Americas, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2001
  4. Hilton v. North Dakota Education Ass'nNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2002
  5. Hillesland v. Federal Land Bank Ass'n of Grand ForksNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1987

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API