Derebery v. Pitt County Fire Marshall
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
MARTIN, Judge.
We are presented with two questions. The first is whether the Industrial Commission correctly calculated plaintiffs weekly compensation benefits. We hold that it did. The second is whether the Commission properly required defendant to furnish plaintiff with a wheelchair accessible residence. We hold that portion of the Commission’s opinion and award to be error.
In his appeal, plaintiff assigns error to the manner in which the Industrial Commission determined the amount of weekly compensation to which he is entitled as a result of his injury. Payment of compensation to a…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Barnhardt v. Yellow Cab CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
- McLean v. Roadway Express, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
- Rorie v. Holly Farms Poultry Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
- Godwin Ex Rel. Godwin v. Swift & Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
- Peace River Elec. Corp. v. ChoateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1982
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- McDonald v. Brunswick Electric Membership Corp.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985
- Tinajero v. Balfour Beatty Infrastructure, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2014
- R & T CONSTRUCTION CO. v. JudgeCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1990
- Grantham v. Cherry HospitalCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1990
- Burnham v. McGee Bros.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2012
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.