Legal Opinion

Grantham v. Cherry Hospital

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided April 3, 1990No. 8910IC867PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ARNOLD, Judge.

In this case we must decide if N.C. Gen. Stat. § 97-29 of the Workers’ Compensation Act authorizes the Industrial Commission to order an employer to pay an employee’s common consumer debts as a “rehabilitative service.” N.C. Gen. Stat. § 97-29 requires that “[i]n cases of total and permanent disability, compensation, including reasonable and necessary nursing services, medicines, sick travel, medical, hospital, and other treatment or care or rehabilitative services shall be paid for by the employer during the lifetime of the injured employee” (emphasis added). N.C. Gen. Stat. §…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Little v. Penn Ventilator Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1986
  2. Derebery v. Pitt County Fire MarshallSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1986
  3. Petty v. Associated Transport, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1970
  4. Hardy v. SmallSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957
  5. Squeo v. Comfort Control Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1985

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Tinajero v. Balfour Beatty Infrastructure, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2014
  2. Scarboro v. Emery Worldwide Freight Corp.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2008
  3. Burnham v. McGee Bros.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2012
  4. Carroll v. Town of AydenCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2003
  5. Carroll v. Town of AydenCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2003

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API