State v. Russell
Hawaii Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT BY
LUM, J.
This appeal involves the statutory interpretation of Hawaii’s New Penal Code (New Code) and its application to an offense triable under Hawaii’s Pre-Penal Code (Old Code); it also involves the statutory interpretation of Hawaii’s detainer agreement, under chapter 834, HRS. The circuit court had dismissed an indictment charging both defendants, Robert Taylor Russell and Lawrence Frederick Carlson, with two counts of obtaining money under fraudulent and false pretenses under HRS § 750-21 (Old Code). The court had ruled that the statute of limitations of the New…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Schlemmer v. Buffalo, Rochester & Pittsburg Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1907
- Vasquez v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1977
- State v. HickmanDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1966
- State v. ChristensenWashington Supreme Court · 1943
- Hall v. Corp. of Catholic ArchbishopWashington Supreme Court · 1972
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- State v. KaakimakaHawaii Supreme Court · 1997
- State v. MurrayHawaii Supreme Court · 1980
- State v. TimoteoHawaii Supreme Court · 1997
- Sierra Club v. Department of TransportationHawaii Supreme Court · 2007
- State v. NobrigaHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 1994
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.