Airness & Accountability in Insurance Reform v. Greene
Arizona Supreme Court
1Dissent
MOELLER, Vice Chief Justice,
dissenting.
SUMMARY
I respectfully dissent. I do so because I cannot agree with the majority’s conclusion that “it is apparent that the council acts in an administrative or ministerial role, rather than in any legislative capacity, in fulfilling its duty to prepare and file with the Secretary of State an impartial analysis of initiative proposals.” Maj. op. at 588, 886 P.2d at 1344; see also FAIR v. Greene, No. CV-94-0317-SA, order at 2 (Ariz. Aug. 12, 1994) (instructing Legislative Council to reconsider and adopt a new analysis, labelling the Council “an agency of…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Mississippi v. JohnsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1867
- Adams v. BolinArizona Supreme Court · 1952
- Tilson v. MoffordArizona Supreme Court · 1987
- State Board of Barber Examiners v. WalkerArizona Supreme Court · 1948
- Industrial Develop. Auth. of Cty. of Pinal v. NelsonArizona Supreme Court · 1973
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.