In re Adam H.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
Order unanimously modified on the law and as modified affirmed without costs in accordance with the following Memorandum: "The denial of visitation to a noncustodial parent constitutes such a drastic remedy that it should be ordered only when there are compelling reasons, and there must be substantial evidence that such visitation is detrimental to the children’s welfare” (Vasile v Vasile, 116 AD2d 1021; see also, Gowan v Menga, 178 AD2d 1021, 1022; De Pinto v De Pinto, 98 AD2d 985; Parker v Ford, 89 AD2d 806). There was substantial evidence to support the court’s termination of respondent’s…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Nacson v. NacsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
- Paul B. S. v. Pamela J. S.New York Court of Appeals · 1987
- Parker v. FordAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
- Schneider v. SchneiderAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
- Vasile v. VasileAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Zafran v. ZafranAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
- Matthews v. MatthewsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- Thaxton v. MorroAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
- Ralph M. v. Nancy M.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
- Aquino v. AntongiorgiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.