Legal Opinion · Dissent

Fletcher Hill, Inc. v. Crosbie

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided January 14, 2005No. 02-348Published

1Dissent

Dooley, J.,

¶ 21. dissenting. Noting that the jury could have awarded more relief to defendant than it did, the trial court apparently felt that it would do rough justice by refusing to award attorney’s fees to either party and by reducing plaintiff’s interest recovery rate by half. If the attorney’s fees issue involved only a matter of discretion in the trial court, I would affirm for the reasons stated by the trial judge and the majority. It is not, however, a matter solely of discretion, and the decision is contrary to the clear law governing this issue. Similarly, the trial court’s…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Ruckelshaus v. Sierra ClubSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Riss v. AngelWashington Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Oil, Chemical & Atomic Workers International Union v. Department of EnergyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2002
  4. City of Chanute v. Williams Natural Gas Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1994
  5. Szoboszlay v. GlessnerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1983

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API