Legal Opinion

Taylor v. Stephens

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided October 16, 1897PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from Bosque. Tried, below before Hon. J. M. Hall.

1Opinion of the Court

STEPHENS, Associate Justice.

C. W. Taylor and wife recovered judgment for an undivided interest in a 640-acres tract of land, and also for rents, against W. C. Stephens and wife, which was affirmed by this court. Stephens v. Taylor, 36 S. W. Rep., 1083.

The petition upon which the recovery for rents was had in general terms alleged against Stephens and wife an ouster, of Taylor and wife as tenants in common, and an appropriation of the rents and profits to which Taylor and wife were entitled, praying in general terms for the recovery thereof, hut without seeking to have a decree specifically…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Zeliff v. JenningsTexas Supreme Court · 1884
  2. Crawford v. DoggettTexas Supreme Court · 1891
  3. Griffith v. ClarkeCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1862
  4. White v. Foote L. & M. Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1887
  5. Lee v. RyallSupreme Court of Alabama · 1880

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Martin v. MartinCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1939
  2. Dendinger v. MartinCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1920
  3. Straus v. ShamblinCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1938
  4. Teague v. BurkCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1927
  5. Magerstadt v. LambertCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1905

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API