Legal Opinion

Cinatl v. Prososki

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided October 16, 2020No. S-19-972PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Nebraska Supreme Court Online Library www.nebraska.gov/apps-courts-epub/ 01/08/2021 09:08 AM CST - 477 - Nebraska Supreme Court Advance Sheets 307 Nebraska Reports CINATL v. PROSOSKI Cite as

307 Neb. 477

Robert H. Cinatl, appellant, v. Karen R. Prososki, Personal Representative of the Estate of Robert R. Prososki, deceased, and Karen R. Prososki, individually and as beneficiary of the Estate of Robert R. Prososki, deceased, appellee. ___ N.W.2d ___ Filed October 16, 2020. No. S-19-972. 1. Appeal and Error. An alleged error must be both specifically assigned and specifically argued in the brief…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Kracl v. LosekeNebraska Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Cullinane v. Beverly Enters.-Neb., Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2018
  3. AVG Partners I v. Genesis Health ClubsNebraska Supreme Court · 2020
  4. Mid-Wilshire Associates v. O'LEARYCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
  5. Nelson Paving Co., Inc. v. HjelleNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1973

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Tegra Corp. v. BoeshartNebraska Supreme Court · 2022
  2. Florence Lake Investments v. BergNebraska Supreme Court · 2022
  3. Ramaekers v. Creighton UniversityNebraska Supreme Court · 2022
  4. In re Estate of MarshNebraska Supreme Court · 2020
  5. In re Estate of WigginsNebraska Supreme Court · 2023

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API