State v. Medina
Supreme Court of New Jersey
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the Court was delivered by
POLLOCK, J.
The issue is whether the jury instructions in these cases satisfied the requirements of due process in explaining that the State bears the burden of proving defendants’ guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. After consolidating the eases, the Appellate Division affirmed the convictions of both defendants. We affirm both judgments.
I
State v. Medina
On the night of June 14, 1990, Jose Torres and Michael Babilonia drove to a Camden apartment building where their friend Jimmy Rivera lived. When Babilonia beeped the car horn, Rivera’s girlfriend,…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Duncan v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Sullivan v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Victor v. NebraskaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by39 opinions
- State v. WakefieldSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2007
- State v. AlekseySupreme Court of South Carolina · 2000
- State v. DreherNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1997
- Smith v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1998
- State v. FuquaNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1997
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.