Legal Opinion

Luxor Cab Manufacturing Corp. v. Leading Cab Co.

New York Supreme Court

Decided October 13, 1925PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Levy, J.:

The plaintiff has been engaged in the business of producing and distributing a certain type of taxicab known as the “ Luxor ” since October, 1923. This taxicab is marketed under a uniform contract requiring each of the cars to be subject to the inspection of the plaintiff, to be stored in plaintiff’s garages, to be maintained according to certain standards, and to be operated by chauffeurs wearing the Luxor uniform, at the lowest city taxicab rates.

In order to familiarize the public with the service it is offering, the plaintiff has adopted a uniform design and color combination upon…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. McLean v. FlemingSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  2. Menendez v. HoltSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
  3. N. K. Fairbank Co. v. R. W. Bell Manuf'g Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1896
  4. Colman v. . CrumpNew York Court of Appeals · 1877
  5. Rosenburg v. Fremont Undertaking Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1911

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. American Chain Co. v. Carr Chain Works, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1931
  2. Charles S. Cash, Inc. v. SteinbookAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1927
  3. Mastercrafters Clock & Radio Co. v. Vacheron & Constantin-Le Coultre Watches, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1954
  4. Winthrop Chemical Co. v. BlackmanNew York Supreme Court · 1934
  5. Brillo Manufacturing Co. v. LevineAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1932

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API