Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

State v. O'NEAL

New Mexico Court of Appeals

Decided December 11, 2007No. 25,710Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partKennedy, Judge

{32} I concur with the majority that to allow the prosecutor’s repeated reference to Defendant’s notice of alibi and the name of the purported alibi witness was error. Unfortunately, this is a case where the only answer to the question of what the proper result would have been is to allow the trial to end without putting improper evidence before the jury. Since I cannot fairly state that the pinning of the notice of alibi and its witness to the defense well in advance of the defense’s case did not appreciably affect the verdict, I will not agree that the error upon which we agree was…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Williams v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. Wardius v. OregonSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. United States v. Larry D. HallCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1999
  4. People v. ShannonMichigan Court of Appeals · 1979
  5. People v. HunterMichigan Court of Appeals · 1980

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API