Legal Opinion

Evansville & Terre Haute Railroad v. Marohn

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided May 11, 1893No. 916PublishedCited by 13 opinions

Erom the Daviess Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtLotz, J.

On the 8th day of May, 1890, the appellee was traveling upon a highway in Knox county, Indiana, and, at a point where said highway crossed appellant’s main track, he was struck by the locomotive engine attached to a *647passenger train, and liimsel.f, and his wagon and horses, were injured. He brought this action to recover damages tor the injtiries sustained..

His complaint is in three paragraphs. The gravamen of the first is that the train approached said crossing at an immoderate and dangerous rate of speed, and that appellant’s employes in charge failed and omitted to ring the bell or sound…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Pennsylvania Co. v. MarionIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  2. Indianapolis & St. Louis Railroad v. StoutIndiana Supreme Court · 1876
  3. Cincinnati, Hamilton & Indianapolis Railroad v. ButlerIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  4. Cincinnati, Indianapolis, St. Louis & Chicago Railway Co. v. HowardIndiana Supreme Court · 1890
  5. Lake Shore & Michigan Southern R. W. Co. v. McCormickIndiana Supreme Court · 1880

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Grand Rapids & Indiana Railroad v. CoxIndiana Court of Appeals · 1893
  2. Milburn v. PhillipsIndiana Supreme Court · 1893
  3. Keeley Brewing Co. v. ParninIndiana Court of Appeals · 1895
  4. Keller v. GaskillIndiana Court of Appeals · 1894
  5. Pittsburgh, Cincinnati & St. Louis Railway Co. v. BennettIndiana Court of Appeals · 1893

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API