Legal Opinion
Zaretsky v. EF Hutton & Co., Inc.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided January 23, 1981No. 79 Civ. 1250PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
LOWE, District Judge.
• This is an action based on the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (“Exchange Act”), 15 U.S.C. §§ 78a et seq., 1 in which plaintiffs seek damages based on the following claims of wrongdoing: (1) excessive trading (“churning”); 2 (2) unsuitable recommendations as to the purchase and sale of stock; 3 (3) fraudulent misrepresentations and omissions in the opening of a margin account and options account; 4 and (4) common law fraud. 5 Defendant E. F. Hutton & Company, Inc. (“Hutton”) has moved, pursuant to Rules 9(b) and 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Annette Heyman v. Commerce and Industry Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1975
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 93,590 David Segal v. Lawrence Gordon, and Coburn Corporation of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1972
- Carter v. StantonSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Ross v. A. H. Robins Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1979
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- In Re Catanella and EF Hutton and Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1984
- Rose v. Arkansas Valley Environmental & Utility AuthorityDistrict Court, W.D. Missouri · 1983
- Jaksich v. Thomson McKinnon Securities, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1984
- International Television Productions Ltd. v. Twentieth Century-Fox Television Division of Twentieth Century-Fox Film Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1985
- Yancoski v. EF Hutton & Co., Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1983
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.