Legal Opinion

State v. Storbakken

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided July 18, 1996No. Criminal 950359PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VANDE WALLE, Chief Justice.

Richard Clarence Storbakken appealed from a judgment of conviction, entered upon a conditional plea of guilty, for driving under the influence of alcohol in violation of section 39-08-01, NDCC. We conclude that the officer’s stop of Storbakken’s vehicle was valid, that the criminal proceeding did not subject Storbakken to double jeopardy, and that the district court did not abuse its discretion by denying the defendant’s motion to suppress the intoxilyzer test results. We affirm the district court’s judgment.

On May 25, 1995, at approximately 1:12 a.m., Officer Troy…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Ashe v. SwensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. Asbridge v. North Dakota State Highway CommissionerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Hofsommer v. Hofsommer Excavating, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1992
  4. State v. HawleyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1995
  5. State v. ZimmermanNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1995

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. State v. FieldsNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2003
  2. Flattum-Riemers v. Flattum-RiemersNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Maragos v. T.J.K.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1999
  4. State v. FranzenNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2010
  5. Crawford v. Director, North Dakota Department of TransportationNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2017

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API