Legal Opinion
State v. Franzen
North Dakota Supreme Court
Decided December 21, 2010No. 20100105PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CROTHERS, Justice.
[¶ 1] Cullan Franzen appeals from an order deferring imposition of sentence entered after he conditionally pled guilty, reserving the right to appeal the district court’s decision to deny his motion to suppress. We affirm, concluding the evidence supports the district court’s denial of Franzen’s motion to suppress.
I
[¶ 2] At approximately 9:52 a.m. on November 15, 2008, North Dakota Highway Patrol Officer Steven Mayer stopped Franzen for driving 82 mph in a 60 mph zone. As Mayer stopped the vehicle, he observed a passenger in the front seat of the vehicle “making furtive…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Whren v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- United States v. MendenhallSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- United States v. Gregory B. Bloomfield, Also Known as Earl Marcum JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1994
- United States v. Donald H. JonesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2001
- United States v. SimpsonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2010
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- State v. DevileyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2011
- State v. HallNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2017
- State v. AsbachNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2015
- Ell v. Director, Department of TransportationNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2016
- Moberly v. CommonwealthMissouri Court of Appeals · 2018
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.