Legal Opinion

State v. Bogle

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided May 31, 1988No. 876SC1068PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PARKER, Judge.

Defendant brings forward three assignments of error. Defendant first assigns error to the trial court’s instructions to the jury concerning the element of knowledge in each offense. Defendant next assigns error to the trial court’s failure to give a requested instruction that evidence of defendant’s good character could be considered as substantive evidence. Defendant’s final assignment of error is directed to the trial court’s entry of judgment against defendant for both trafficking by possession and trafficking by transportation.

On 7 April 1987, defendant was driving a Toyota…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. State v. OdomSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
  2. State v. EarnhardtSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
  3. United States v. Charles Demore JewellCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1976
  4. United States v. Earnest Jackson, Jr., and James Arthur Porter, IIICourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1979
  5. State v. PerrySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1986

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. BogleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1989
  2. State v. JonesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1989
  3. State v. EasterlingCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1995
  4. John Thomas Kuiken v. Randy Lee Attorney General of North Carolina, John Thomas Kuiken v. Randy Lee Attorney General of North CarolinaCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1995
  5. State v. BogleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1989

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API