Legal Opinion
State v. Dearborn
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided May 4, 2004No. AC 22645PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
SCHALLER, J.
The defendant, John Dearborn, appeals from the judgment of conviction, rendered after a jury trial, of robbery in the first degree in violation of General Statutes § 53a-134 (a) (4).1 On appeal, the defendant claims that (1) the trial court improperly *736admitted evidence of three other robberies, (2) the court improperly admitted physical evidence, (3) the state committed prosecutorial misconduct, thereby depriving him of a fair trial, and (4) the court improperly instructed the jury. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.
The jury reasonably could have found the following…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Donnelly v. DeChristoforoSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- State v. GoldingSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
- State v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
- State v. CeballosSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
- State v. FigueroaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- State v. HollidayConnecticut Appellate Court · 2004
- State v. Antonio A.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2005
- State v. HolleyConnecticut Appellate Court · 2005
- State v. JordanConnecticut Appellate Court · 2012
- State v. SantiagoConnecticut Appellate Court · 2007
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.