Legal Opinion

Marshall v. West

Court of Chancery of Delaware

Decided May 20, 1932Published

1Opinion of the Court

The Chancellor:

First. Was the legacy adeemed by transfer and delivery of the two thousand dollars insurance policy?

• “A legacy is not adeemed by a gift made before the execution of the will in which the legacy was given.” This is taken from 28 R. C. L., p. 350, par. 346, and correctly states the general principle. It is supported by Jaques v. Swasey, 153 Mass. 596, 27 N. E. 771, 13 L. R. A. 566; In re Crawford, 113 N. Y. 560, 21 N. E. 692, 5 L. R. A. 71; Zeiter v. Zeiter, 4 Watts (Pa.) 212, 28 Am. Dec. 698; Jones v. Richardson, 5 Metc. (Mass.) 247. In the last cited case, Chief Justice Shaw…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. In Re the Judicial Settlement of the Account of CrawfordNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
  2. Rambo v. RumerCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1866
  3. Jaques v. SwaseyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1891
  4. Johnson v. McDowellSupreme Court of Iowa · 1912
  5. University of Delaware v. Equitable Trust Co.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API