Legal Opinion

University of Delaware v. Equitable Trust Co.

Court of Chancery of Delaware

Decided May 20, 1932PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The Chancellor:

Are the legacies chargeable upon and payable out of the land? This is a question of intention. Morgan v. Morgan, et al., 14 Del. Ch. 171, 123 A. 185. An intention to charge real estate with the payment of pecuniary legacies may be gathered from the circumstances that after the bequest of such legacies, “the remainder if any” (Hilford, Adm’r., v. Way, et al., 1 Del. Ch. 342) or , “the balance of my estate, if there be any” (Rambo, Ex’r., v. Rumer, et al., 4 Del. Ch. 9) is given to residuary beneficiaries. Chancellor Bates in the last cited case appears to lay stress upon the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Rambo v. RumerCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1866
  2. Hilford v. WayCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1830
  3. Walters v. YoungCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1921
  4. Rice v. RiceCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1920
  5. Todd v. GambrillCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1927

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Cooper v. BishopCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1932
  2. Security Trust Co. v. BulcroftCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1936
  3. James v. Equitable Security Trust Co.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1955
  4. Marshall v. WestCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API