Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Stubbs v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided December 5, 1994No. A94A1767Published

1ConcurrenceBirdsong, Presiding Judge

Because appellant failed to request the trial court to give a specific instruction to the jury utilizing the statutory language of OCGA § 24-4-6, and because the trial court did give detailed instructions defining, inter alia, circumstantial evidence, properly placing the burden of proof on the State, and charging that mere presence at the crime scene was insufficient to support conviction, I would affirm.

The time has come to clarify this area of the law in a manner compatible with the recent holdings of the Supreme Court of Georgia in Mims v. State, 264 Ga. 271 (443 SE2d 845) and Robinson v.…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Robinson v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1991
  2. Mims v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1994
  3. Gordy Tire Co. v. Dayton Rubber Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1960
  4. Hogan v. AtkinsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1968
  5. Chives v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1994

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API