Legal Opinion

Hogan v. Atkins

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided May 23, 1968No. 24632PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Almand, Presiding Justice.

The main question presented in this habeas corpus case is whether Code § 26-2701, under which the appellant was convicted, is unconstitutional for vagueness as violative of the due process of law clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution.

Code § 26-2701 provides: “It shall be unlawful for any person to make or mend, or cause to be made or mended, or to have in his possession in the day or nighttime, any engine, machine, jimmy, tool, false key, pick-lock, bit, nippers, nitroglycerin, dynamite cap, dynamite, or other explosive, fuse, steel…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. United States v. PetrilloSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. Boyce Motor Lines, Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
  3. Jones v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1964
  4. Shafer v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1964
  5. Wilson v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1967

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. People v. ChastainSupreme Court of Colorado · 1987
  2. Stubbs v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1995
  3. Lanthrip v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1975
  4. Kennon v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1998
  5. In Re Leroy T.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1979

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API