Legal Opinion

Hagen Supply Corporation, a Minnesota Corporation v. Iowa National Mutual Insurance Company, an Iowa Corporation

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided April 29, 1964No. 17502_1PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MATTHES, Circuit Judge.

This appeal presents two questions: first, whether a policy of insurance issued by appellee (hereinafter referred to as “Insurer”) to appellant (hereinafter referred to as “Hagen”) affords the latter protection on a claim for injuries sustained by a third party as the result of the discharge of a tear gas device sold by Hagen; second, whether Insurer was required under its policy to defend Hagen on the claim asserted against it. The trial court, Judge Larson, held that there was no coverage and that Insurer was not oblig-ated to defend the claim. From this judgment…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Bobich v. OjaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1960
  2. Standard Acc. Ins. Co. v. RobertsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1942
  3. Crum v. Anchor Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1963
  4. Blohm v. Glens Falls InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1962
  5. Berger Bros. Electric Motors, Inc. v. New Amsterdam Casualty Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1944

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Taurus Holdings v. US FidelitySupreme Court of Florida · 2005
  2. City of Willoughby Hills v. Cincinnati InsuranceOhio Supreme Court · 1984
  3. CACI International, Inc. v. St. Paul Fire & Marine InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2009
  4. Terrio v. McDONOUGH HARTFORD FIRE INS. CO.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1983
  5. The Babcock & Wilcox Company v. Parsons Corporation v. Insurance Company of North AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1970

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API