Legal Opinion

Biggert v. Hicks

City of New York Municipal Court

Decided December 15, 1896PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Appeal by defendant from interlocntory judgment sustaining plaintiff’s demurrer to the second separate defense.

1Opinion of the Court

Van Wyck, Ch. J.

The plaintiff’s demurrer was to the separate defense, that the policy of insurance under which defendant was sued as one of several underwriters contained a provision that: “Ho action shall be brought to enforce the provisions of this policy except against the general managers, as attomeys-in-fact, and representing all of the underwriters, and each of the underwriters hereby agrees to abide the result of any suit so brought, as fixing his individual responsibility hereunder.” This demurrer was properly sustained. The Common Pleas, General Term, Pryor, J., writing, has passed…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Knorr v. BatesNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1895
  2. Leiter v. BeecherAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1896
  3. Knorr v. BatesNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1895
  4. Farjeon v. FoggNew York Supreme Court · 1896
  5. Ralli v. HillyerCity of New York Municipal Court · 1895

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Compton v. BeecherAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1897

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API