Armour Packing Co. v. Wolff & Co.

This is an interplea in a garnishment proceeding, in which the trial court rendered a judgment in favor of the plaintiff as against the interpleader. The substantial error assigned by the interpleader on this appehl is that, under the uncontroverted facts, judgment should have been rendered in his favor, and that the court erred in refusing an instruction asked by him, that, upon the hypothetical facts stated therein, he was entitled to judgment against the garnishee.

The following facts were developed at the trial: There was evidence tending to show that one Schuchmann, the defendant in the…