Legal Opinion
One Hundred Forty-Eight Street Realty Co. v. Conrad
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
Decided June 9, 1925PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Lazansky, J.:
Plaintiff is the owner of certain premises upon which defendant insurance company holds a recorded mortgage executed and delivered by the predecessor in title of plaintiff. Defendant Conrad is a tenant of the premises. Defendant real estate company is agent of defendant insurance company. The mortgage contains the following clause:
"And the said party of the second part, its successors, legal representatives, or assigns, shall also be at liberty, immediately after any default in the payment of the principal sum hereby secured, or of any instalment thereof or of the interest…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Freedman's Saving & Trust Co. v. ShepherdSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
- Kortright v. . CadyNew York Court of Appeals · 1860
- Teal v. WalkerSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
- Sullivan v. . RossonNew York Court of Appeals · 1918
- Sage v. Memphis & Little Rock RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Kinnison v. Guaranty Liquidating Corp.California Supreme Court · 1941
- Prudential Ins. Co. of America v. Liberdar Holding Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1934
- Watt's Administrator v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1933
- Dime Savings Bank of Brooklyn v. AltmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1936
- 1180 Anderson Avenue Realty Corp. v. Mina Equities Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.