Rollins v. . Henry
Supreme Court of North Carolina
MotioN by the plaintiffs for the Appointment of a Receiver of certain premises, pending an action for the recovery of the same, heard at Spring Term, 1877, of Buncombe Superior Court, before Furches, J. The case is sufficiently stated in the opinion of this Court. His Honor overruled the motion and the plaintiffs appealed.
1Opinion of the CourtBynum, J.
In Rollins v. Rollins, 76 N. C. 264, and the two next succeeding cases of the same plaintiffs against Bishop and Henry, it was decided by this Court, that R. M. Henry was entitled to defend those actions and that the tenants claiming under him had been illegally evicted and were entitled to restitution of possession, pending the actions. In part execution of the judgment of this Court, at the last term of the Court below the several actions were consolidated and-the defendant N. M. Henry on filing the bond required by law, was allowed to put in,bis defences to the action. But when in further…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Rollins v. . RollinsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1877
3Cited by14 opinions
- Bond v. . WoolSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1890
- Narron v. Union Camp Corp.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1986
- Morris v. WilkinsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
- Durant v. . CrowellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1887
- Sengfelder v. HillWashington Supreme Court · 1897
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.