Legal Opinion

In Re Battle

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided September 24, 1947PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWinborne, J.

This is the sole question on this appeal: Do such of “the children and grandchildren” of the testator as survived the devisee named take the home farm per capita and not per stirpes? The decisions of this Court furnish an affirmative answer. See Shull v. Johnson, 55 N. C., 202; Leggett v. Simpson, 176 N. C., 3, 96 S. E., 63; Ex Parte Brogden, 180 N. C., 157, 104 S. E., 177; Mitchell v. Parks, 180 N. C., 634, 105 S. E., 398; Burton v. Cahill, 192 N. C., 505, 135 S. E., 332; Lamm v. Mayo, 217 N. C., 261, 7 S. E. (2d), 501; Tillman v. O’Briant, 220 N. C., 114, 18 S. E. (2d), 131; Wooten v.…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Cannon v. . CannonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1945
  2. Burton v. . CahillSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1926
  3. Leggett v. . SimpsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1918
  4. Wooten v. . OutlandSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1946
  5. Shull v. . JohnsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1855

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. WACHOVIA BANK AND TRUST COMPANY v. BryantSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
  2. Wachovia Bank and Trust Co. v. LivengoodSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
  3. Dew v. ShockleyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1978
  4. White v. Wachovia Bank & Trust Co.District Court, M.D. North Carolina · 1966
  5. WACHOVIA BANK AND TRUST COMPANY v. BryantSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API