Legal Opinion

Nix v. Freightliner Corp.

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided January 22, 1997No. 93-02704; CA A87100PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtLandau, J.

Claimant seeks review of an order of the Workers’ Compensation Board (Board) holding that an award of attorney fees is subject to an offset based on prior overpayment of compensation. Claimant contends that the Board’s own rules expressly prohibit such an offset. Employer contends that the Board’s construction of its rules to allow an offset in the circumstances of this case is a reasonable one and should be upheld. We conclude that the Board’s rules unambiguously prohibit offsetting an award of attorney fees based on prior overpayments. We therefore reverse the order and remand the case for…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Armstrong v. Asten-Hill Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1988
  2. Don't Waste Oregon Committee v. Energy Facility Siting CouncilOregon Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Volk v. America West AirlinesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1995
  4. Weyerhaeuser Co. v. SheldonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1987

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Country Mutual Insurance v. MendozaCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API