Legal Opinion

Operation New Birmingham v. Flynn

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided June 4, 1993No. 1911927, 1911966Published

1Opinion of the Court

Timothy William Flynn filed a complaint for an injunction against Operation New Birmingham (hereinafter "ONB") and the City of Birmingham, seeking to enjoin ONB and the City of Birmingham from interfering with the operation of Flynn's sidewalk vending business; the trial court denied the injunction. ONB had previously issued a permit to allow Flynn to maintain a sidewalk hot dog cart, but it had later forced him to remove the cart after the owner of a nearby restaurant complained to ONB that the cart was interfering with the restaurant's business. In its order denying the injunction, the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. MorrisonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1908
  2. Strong v. SullivanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
  3. Crabtree v. City of BirminghamSupreme Court of Alabama · 1974
  4. McCraney v. City of LeedsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1941
  5. City of Birmingham v. HoltSupreme Court of Alabama · 1940

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API