City of Birmingham v. Holt
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
' THOMAS, Justice.
The appeal is.by the city to restrain the erection of signs along public streets. The case was submitted upon agreed statement of facts, which is specific and concise. No recital of the same is necessary..
The pleadings are well stated by appellant, in substance, as follows: The City of Birmingham filed a bill against Harry C. Holt seeking a mandatory injunction requiring said Holt to remove certain signs placed by said Holt upon the sidewalks of the City of Birmingham. It is alleged that signs were maintained on posts located in the sidewalks of the streets of the city at…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Beer Co. v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Boyd v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
- First National Bank v. TysonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1901
- Gale v. Village of KalamazooMichigan Supreme Court · 1871
- Wakeman v. . WilburNew York Court of Appeals · 1895
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- McCraney v. City of LeedsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1941
- Edwards v. Town of LantanaSupreme Court of Florida · 1955
- Orange v. BaileySupreme Court of Alabama · 1989
- Smith v. Bus Stops of Greater Miami, Inc.Supreme Court of Florida · 1956
- City of Decatur v. RobinsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1948
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.