Legal Opinion
Dingledine v. Central Reserve Life Insurance
District Court, S.D. Ohio
Decided June 5, 1996No. Civil Action No. C-1-94-71PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER: (1) GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (DOC. 22); (2) DENYING PLAINTIFF’S CROSS SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION (DOC. 19); (3) THEREFORE GRANTING JUDGMENT IN DEFENDANT’S FAVOR; AND (4) TERMINATING THIS CASE UPON THE DOCKET
SHERMAN, United States Magistrate Judge.
This consent case, brought under the Employee Income Retirement Security Act of 1974 (“ERISA”), 29 U.S.C. § 1001 et seq., concerns whether defendant Central Reserve Life Insurance Company (“CRLI”) — in violation of the terms of its 1992 group health insurance policy (ie., its welfare benefits plan, or “Plan”) with…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Valley Forge Christian College v. Americans United for Separation of Church and State, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Connie M. Miller v. Metropolitan Life Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1991
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Janet B. Davies Donald Davies v. Centennial Life Insurance Company, and Dun & Bradstreet Plan Services, Inc., Jerome J. Siegel, D.D.S., Third-PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1997
- Jillian M. Florentino v. Hartford Life and Accident Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, W.D. Kentucky · 2026