Legal Opinion
Lofland v. Meyers
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided September 28, 1977No. 76 Civ. 5369 (HFW)PublishedCited by 29 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
WERKER, District Judge.
Plaintiff, James Lofland, has filed this pro se complaint for money damages alleging that his conviction for criminal fraud in a prior suit brought by the United States was the result of defendants’ intentional, malicious, and wanton violation of plaintiff’s constitutional and civil rights. Defendants now seek to dismiss the complaint pursuant to Rule 12(b)(1) and (6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure for lack of subject matter jurisdiction and failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted; defendants also move for summary judgment pursuant…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Imbler v. PachtmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Gregoire v. BiddleCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1949
- Yaselli v. GoffCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1926
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Iqbal v. HastyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2007
- Hobson v. WilsonCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1984
- Juan A. Marrero and Maria Marrero v. City of Hialeah, Etc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980
- L. Patrick Gray, III v. Griffin BellCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1983
- Rodney Taylor v. Michael KavanaghCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1981
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.