Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Roberts v. Norfolk and Western Railway Co.

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided June 4, 1992No. 4-91-0647Published

1Concurrence

JUSTICE COOK,

specially concurring:

While I agree with the majority as to reversal and remand for a new trial, and with the majority’s analysis of most issues, I disagree on some points.

A recipient of mental health or developmental disabilities services who wishes to prevent disclosure of his records or communications must be consistent in expressing his desire for confidentiality. If there is a disclosure of confidential information by the recipient, or if he permits such a disclosure, the privilege is waived and cannot be reasserted. (Novak v. Rathnam (1985), 106 Ill. 2d 478, 484, 478 N.E.2d…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. People v. BeanIllinois Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Tzystuck v. Chicago Transit AuthorityIllinois Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Novak v. RathnamIllinois Supreme Court · 1985
  4. Maxwell v. Hobart Corp.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1991
  5. People v. ChambersAppellate Court of Illinois · 1989

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API