Roberts v. Norfolk and Western Railway Co.
Appellate Court of Illinois
1Concurrence
JUSTICE COOK,
specially concurring:
While I agree with the majority as to reversal and remand for a new trial, and with the majority’s analysis of most issues, I disagree on some points.
A recipient of mental health or developmental disabilities services who wishes to prevent disclosure of his records or communications must be consistent in expressing his desire for confidentiality. If there is a disclosure of confidential information by the recipient, or if he permits such a disclosure, the privilege is waived and cannot be reasserted. (Novak v. Rathnam (1985), 106 Ill. 2d 478, 484, 478 N.E.2d…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- People v. BeanIllinois Supreme Court · 1990
- Tzystuck v. Chicago Transit AuthorityIllinois Supreme Court · 1988
- Novak v. RathnamIllinois Supreme Court · 1985
- Maxwell v. Hobart Corp.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1991
- People v. ChambersAppellate Court of Illinois · 1989
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.