Legal Opinion
State v. Peters
Court of Appeals of Wisconsin
Decided May 16, 2000No. 99-1940-CRPublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*743PETERSON, J.
¶ 1. Lawrence Peters collaterally attacks a prior criminal conviction for operating after revocation that enhanced his penalty in this case for subsequently operating after revocation. In the prior conviction, Peters pled no contest and was sentenced via closed-circuit television. Although the closed-circuit television procedure violated statutory criminal procedure, we conclude that the procedure did not violate Peters' constitutional due process rights. Accordingly, we affirm the judgment.
Background
¶ 2. Peters' appeal arises from the statutory scheme providing progressive…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Boykin v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Lindh v. MurphySupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Snyder v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Burgett v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Kentucky v. StincerSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- State v. SotoWisconsin Supreme Court · 2012
- State v. GreveWisconsin Supreme Court · 2004
- People v. StroudIllinois Supreme Court · 2004
- State v. PetersWisconsin Supreme Court · 2001
- In re M.P.Court of Appeals of Texas · 2007
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.