Sarah Tupper, Respondents/Cross-Appellants v. City of St. Louis, Appellants/Cross-Respondents.
Supreme Court of Missouri
1Opinion of the Court
SUPREME COURT OF MISSOURI en banc SARAH TUPPER, et al., ) ) Respondents/Cross-Appellants, ) ) v. ) No. SC94212 ) CITY OF ST. LOUIS, et al., ) ) Appellants/Cross-Respondents. ) APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE CITY OF ST. LOUIS The Honorable Steven R. Ohmer, Judge Opinion issued August 18, 2015 After Sarah K. Tupper and Sandra L. Thurmond each received notices that she had violated ordinance 66868, the City of St. Louis’s red light camera ordinance, they filed suit challenging the validity of the ordinance. They named as defendants the city, city officials, American Traffic Solutions, Inc.…
2Cases cited47 opinions
- Sandstrom v. MontanaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Francis v. FranklinSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- County Court of Ulster Cty. v. AllenSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Mobile, Jackson & Kansas City Railroad v. TurnipseedSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
- J.C.W. Ex Rel. Webb v. WyciskallaSupreme Court of Missouri · 2009
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.